'Even If Unproven, It Dented His Image': Salihu Mahmud Speaks on Allegations of Shettima Sending Marabouts to Pray Against Tinubu

Security expert says unverified claims about Vice President's loyalty created 'tension within political circles' and strained relations within first family

Security expert and media strategist Salihu Mahmud has weighed in on explosive but unverified allegations surrounding Vice President Kashim Shettima, revealing that claims of him sending marabouts to pray for President Bola Tinubu's demise generated significant tension within the presidency despite lacking proof.

Speaking during an interview on Trust TV, Mahmud addressed what he described as a politically charged narrative that circulated within elite circles, noting that even unsubstantiated accusations can carry weight in high-level politics .

The Allegations

According to Mahmud, the claims—which suggested Shettima allegedly engaged marabouts to pray against the president—remained entirely unproven, with no formal investigation or official statement validating them . Yet the mere existence of such rumors created ripples.

"Allegations circulated that Shettima sent marabouts to pray for the president's demise—even if unproven, it dented his image within the first family," Mahmud stated .

Perception vs. Reality

The analyst emphasized that in Nigeria's political environment, perception can sometimes rival established fact in shaping relationships and trust among key actors. He noted that once such narratives enter public discourse—particularly through informal political discussions and online platforms—they gain traction and become difficult to contain .

Mahmud observed that allegations involving spiritual or traditional practices attract heightened attention due to cultural sensitivities, which likely contributed to the controversy's spread despite the absence of concrete evidence .

Political Implications

The security expert suggested that even unfounded rumors can cause reputational damage within political families and elite circles. The mere perception of disloyalty, he said, can strain personal and professional relationships at the highest levels of governance .

He also pointed to the role of political rivals, noting that they sometimes amplify unverified stories to create doubt or exploit existing tensions within administrations .

Context of Isolation Claims

Mahmud's comments add to a broader narrative he has articulated about Shettima's position within the presidency. In recent interviews, he has described the Vice President as being "like a lame dog in the presidency—isolated even within the official vice-presidential residence and not fully carried along with decision-making" .

He has noted that Shettima's limited involvement extends beyond formal duties to informal political networks, affecting his ability to influence appointments and build followership .

No Official Response

Neither the presidency nor Vice President Shettima has issued any statement addressing the allegations. Mahmud himself stressed that the claims remain in the realm of rumor rather than documented fact, though he acknowledged the episode illustrates how public narratives can shape internal political dynamics .

For now, the story serves as a case study in the power of perception—and the damage that can be done by words alone, even when those words remain unproven.