In a strong statement on social media, former Nigerian Head of State General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida has called for a decisive military crackdown on armed groups, urging the government not to accept pleas for surrender from bandits.
Posting on his verified X account, Babangida argued that security forces must prioritize the complete "neutralisation" of militants before considering any dialogue. “While the bandits are pleading for surrender, we must not accept their plea until every one of them is neutralized and eliminated,” he wrote.
He further suggested that after militants are subdued, negotiators and perceived sympathizers, such as controversial Islamic cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi, should be summoned for questioning by authorities.
Contrasting Viewpoints on Security Strategy
Babangida’s hardline position contrasts with recent comments from Sheikh Ahmad Gumi. The former army captain has criticized U.S. military involvement in the region, suggesting instead that Nigeria seek counter-terrorism cooperation with countries like Turkey, China, or Pakistan.
New Government Policy Framework
This public debate coincides with President Bola Tinubu’s announcement of a major reset in Nigeria's security strategy. In a recent address, Tinubu unveiled a new national counterterrorism doctrine that broadly classifies any armed group operating outside state authority as terrorists.
This expanded classification now explicitly includes bandits, militias, armed gangs, and their political, financial, and community enablers. The president stated the new framework is designed to unify command and intensify counter-insurgency operations across the country.
Mixed Public Reaction
Babangida’s remarks have sparked divided reactions online. Some social media users supported his call for a forceful military response, while others cautioned against swift shifts in public opinion regarding complex security figures and strategies.
The ongoing discourse highlights the national search for effective solutions to persistent insecurity, balancing calls for punitive military action with debates over negotiation and foreign partnerships.
0 Comments