A targeted U.S. military operation against terrorist hideouts in northern Nigeria has yielded a new and volatile security challenge. Following the Christmas Day airstrikes ordered by former President Donald Trump, senior military sources confirm that members of Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) have abandoned their bases and are now scattering across remote regions, forcing Nigeria's security forces into a high-stakes pursuit.
The U.S. strikes, which targeted extremist enclaves linked to the Lakurawa group in Sokoto, have triggered a significant disruption within terrorist networks. Intelligence reports indicate that the attacks caused widespread panic in the camps, with fighters splintering into smaller, harder-to-track units. They are now reportedly moving toward forest corridors, border communities, and isolated rural areas in parts of Sokoto, Benue, and surrounding states in an attempt to evade detection and regroup.
Communities on Edge and a Military Tracking Operation
This sudden migration has heightened anxieties on the ground. Local traditional leaders have raised alarms over an unusual influx of armed men into their domains. Many of these groups are reportedly avoiding main roads and towns, seeking refuge in dense forests and sparsely populated settlements. Residents now fear their communities could become unintended sanctuaries or new flashpoints for violence.
The Nigerian military asserts that it is actively tracking the militants. "We know they are fleeing," a senior defence official stated. Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) assets, including aerial and ground units, are now focused on monitoring known and suspected escape routes. The primary objective is to prevent the dispersed fighters from re-establishing command structures or exploiting security gaps to launch retaliatory attacks.
A Heated National Debate Rekindled
Beyond the immediate operational scramble, the U.S. strikes have reignited a fierce national debate about sovereignty and foreign military involvement.
The controversy centers on two key issues:
* Communication and Control: There is significant public discomfort and criticism over the fact that the initial announcement of the airstrikes came from Washington, D.C., not Abuja. Analysts argue this communication gap undermines national authority, with calls for Nigerian officials to provide direct, transparent briefings on actions taken on their own soil.
* The "Boots on the Ground" Question: The possibility of deeper U.S. military collaboration, including the potential deployment of troops, has sharply divided opinions. Some retired generals warn that foreign boots on Nigerian ground could inflame ethnic and religious tensions, weaken national sovereignty, and bolster extremist propaganda. Others contend that Nigeria's technological and precision-strike gaps make such advanced foreign support not just beneficial, but necessary.
Analysts caution that while foreign assistance in areas like air power and intelligence is valuable, Nigeria must retain control over ground operations to ensure long-term legitimacy and stability.
The situation presents Nigeria with a complex post-strike landscape: an enemy that is disrupted but not destroyed, now scattered and potentially more unpredictable. The critical challenge facing security forces is to prevent this tactical dispersal from leading to a wider strategic diffusion of terror across new territories. As terrorists flee and surveillance intensifies, the counter-terrorism campaign has entered what many see as its most dangerous and uncertain phase yet.
0 Comments